Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smokingskul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Smokingskul[edit]

Smokingskul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesnt seen to meet notability requirements Authenyo (talk) 14:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - has two Geffen releases per WP:MUSICBIO but lacks evidence of being "properly verified by reliable sources independent of the subject's own self-published promotional materials." I can't find anything that represents significant coverage of notability in general or specific to plugg. LizardJr8 (talk) 00:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: None of the sources provided states that he's signed to or has released anything under Geffen Records. And SoundCloud isn't a reliable source. TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 07:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.